CONGRESSIONAL FIELD HEARING
ON ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION
A How-To Guide
based on:
"Organ and Tissue Donation:
Mobilizing Massachusetts Families, Communities and Hospitals"
held September 30, 1996
at Harvard Medical School, Boston
Prepared by:
Tana Sherman and Carol Beasley
The Partnership for Organ Donation, Boston, MA
Kathleen Teixeira
Representative J. Joseph Moakley
Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District
Lauren Ewers
Senator Edward M. Kennedy
Massachusetts
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
A Congressional Field Hearing can be an important tool for local
organizations who are working to solve the organ donor shortage. Such an
event can:
- increase public awareness of the need for organs
- increase awareness of hospital professionals about their role in organ
donation
- foster collaboration among local organizations and highlight their
accomplishments
- develop policy initiatives that will work towards these goals
On September 30, 1996, the first-ever hearing on organ and tissue donation
outside of Washington was held in Boston by Rep. Joseph Moakley and Sen.
Edward Kennedy. Organized by The Partnership for Organ Donation, the
event, "Organ and Tissue Donation: Mobilizing Massachusetts Families,
Communities, and Hospitals," was co-sponsored by Harvard Medical School and
the Harvard School of Public Health. Working on the planning committees
were members of the Massachusetts donation/transplantation community.
Witnesses included donor family members, transplant recipients, doctors,
researchers and professionals from organ procurement organizations and
other local organizations.
The event was very successful with a large audience turn-out, good media
coverage, a renewed sense of collegiality and cooperation among the many
organizations working to increase donation, and excellent testimony
provided by two panels of speakers--one panel focusing on family
perspectives and successful community outreach and the other on optimizing
donation in hospitals.
This "How-To Guide" was prepared to strongly encourage other organizations
concerned with organ and tissue donation to work with your congressional
representatives and local legislators to organize similar events in your
own region. In the pages that follow, we tell you how we did it, from the
first concept statement to the final media coverage. We learned a lot and
are happy to share our experiences--both what worked and what we would do
differently--in the hope that it will encourage others to get involved.
We welcome feedback on this material. Please feel free to contact Tana
Sherman or Carol Beasley at (617) 482-5746, or via electronic mail
tsherman@organ-donation.org
or cbeasley@organ-donation.org
.
Back to top
TIMELINE
Most of the planning took place within a four month time-frame from June
through September 1996. The general tasks are described in the month in
which they occurred.
MONTH 1
- Confirm who the "anchor organization" will be, that is, the
organization responsible for overall coordination of the event. In our
case, The Partnership for Organ Donation took on this role, which grew out
of previous contacts with both Rep. Moakley and Sen. Kennedy.
- Complete concept statement; come to consensus on "message" and
general plan with congressional staff. The need for a clear message
cannot be emphasized enough. We focused throughout on the acute need for
organs in Massachusetts and the innovative approaches being taken by
Massachusetts organizations.
- Finalize date for event with Congressmen's schedulers. But be
prepared for anything. When dealing with elected officials, schedules can
change right up to the last minute. Sen. Kennedy was unable to attend our
event at the last minute because of an important vote in the Senate, but
Rep. Moakley was well-prepared to lead the entire event.
- Find a location available on that date. Have the event in a
politically neutral setting where the collaborative nature of the event is
apparent. Harvard Medical School was the gracious host for our event and
the beautiful Waterhouse Faculty Room provided a stately setting for the
hearing.
MONTH 2
- Confirm any co-sponsoring organizations. Along with The
Partnership for Organ Donation, our co-sponsors were Harvard Medical
School and Harvard School of Public Health. These were the groups that did
the bulk of the logistical planning.
- Touch base with congressional staff every couple of weeks for input
on meeting design and speakers that they would like to see included.
The phone lines were continually carrying conversations and faxes between
our office and Washington. We can't stress enough the necessity for
constant communication throughout the planning process.
- Develop detailed framework agenda with time slots and speaking
topics. (See Appendix C.)
This was a constantly changing document as we matched the "message" of the event to
the speakers who could deliver it most effectively.
MONTH 3
- Convene small planning meetings for co-sponsoring organizations.
(See Appendix D.) We held
three meetings, which included the directors of public affairs at Harvard Medical
School and the Harvard School of Public Health, key Harvard researchers who
have worked on organ donation, and the managing director and communications
coordinator from The Partnership.
- Review logistical requirements and designate responsibilities.
Harvard Medical School had an event planner on staff who was quite adept at
handling logistics.
- Finalize a specific room, based on estimated attendance. The
Waterhouse Faculty Room is an elegant room and just the right size for the
70-100 people we anticipated. Harvard was also able to provide an overflow
room, although we did not actually use it on the day of the hearing.
- Schedule planning meeting for broader donation/transplantation
community. This is important for buy-in. There are inherent benefits
to bringing this group together, particularly if they haven't worked
together before. For us this included New England Organ Bank, Northeast
Organ Procurement Organization, New England Chapter of TRIO, the state
branches of the National Kidney Foundation and American Liver Foundation,
and the Family Inn.
- Conduct planning meeting including representatives from broader
donation/transplantation community. We actually did this at the
beginning of Month 4; Month 3 would probably be better. This planning
group made specific recommendations about speakers, message points and
policy initiatives and was the key to building enthusiasm about the event.
- Draft flyer and press release annoucing event. (See Appendix F.) This brief
announcement/press release went into the newsletters of participating organizations, such as
TRIO, as well as the national publication, Transplant News. The flyer was
distributed by all participating organizations to their board members and
their communities.
MONTH 4
- Focus the message. What do you want the headline to be following
the event? We knew we wanted a few key points to come across:
Massachusetts has an acute shortage of organs for transplantation;
transplantation works, as evidenced by Rep. Moakley and the members of the
Transplant Games team; and hospitals can do more to increase donation.
- Finalize all speaker recruitment. With the help of the larger
planning team, we prepared a working list of several speakers for each
slot. This was useful when some potential speakers we contacted had
previous commitments for that date.
- Provide guidance on testimony preparation. Make sure testimony is
consistent with the message of the event. We made calls to all
speakers and went over the key message points that each should include. We
also offered to help prepare testimony, type it, do cover sheets or
whatever else the speakers wanted help with.
- Launch publicity effort. The Congressional offices decided that
Moakley's press secretary would release the media advisory. We submitted a
draft to her, which she revised and issued on Rep. Moakley's letterhead.
- Finalize all logistical arrangements. All kinds of things came
up at the last minute, such as making sure that security arrangements were
coordinated between the congressional offices and Harvard's security
police. The Harvard event planner coordinated most of the final logistics.
- Assist congressional press office to expand reach of media
advisory. We asked the participants on our planning teams to make
calls to their own media contacts.
MONTH 5--After the Hearing
- Brainstorm with those involved on what worked and what didn't.
Knowing that we were going to prepare this guide, we took the time to talk
among ourselves and make calls to co-sponsors, planning team members and
the Congressional aides. All agreed that the event was a success, but
specific feedback was extremely valuable.
- Write thank-you notes to all speakers, congressional aides and
involved staff of co-sponsoring and participating organizations. Do
not forget this step, particularly since the links established by this
event should continue in future collaborative initiatives. Saying thank
you was really easy--everyone had worked hard and had been enthusiastic
about the hearing.
- Follow-up with calls to media who covered event, offering to assist
with future stories. Even the most hard-boiled reporter appreciates
hearing that his story was well-written and that he's done some good by
informing the public about the value of organ donation. One such call to
the Boston Globe resulted in interest by the reporter in doing another
story a month later on the hospital role in organ donation.
- Follow-up with congressional staff on policy recommendations
generated at the hearing. The hearing enabled to us to establish a
really warm and productive working relation with Rep. Moakley's and Sen.
Kennedy's staff. They are eager to continue working on this
issue.
Back to top
PLANNING TEAMS
As soon as word got out that a Congressional field hearing was being planned
, we began to receive numerous phone calls from individuals and groups who
wanted to be involved. Clearly, if we had tried to convene everyone from
the start and had tried to reach a consensus on every planning decision,
the event would never have taken place! Therefore, we identified three
distinct planning teams, each with an important role in making decisions
about the hearing:
Congressional Aides & the Anchor Organization
Who: This team consisted of two Congressional health policy
aides--one from Rep. Moakley's office and one from Sen. Kennedy's office;
the managing director and communications coordinator from The Partnership;
an aide from Sen. Kennedy's Boston office; and Rep. Moakley's press
secretary. Key decisions were made by this group prior to convening either
of the other two teams.
How: All decisions were arrived at through regular phone
conversations, including one conference call, and were made by consensus.
Tasks:
- Make key decisions about date, format, location
- Create overall concept statement, including purpose, goals, audience,
potential speakers, key message points (see Appendix C)
- Gather testimony in writing from all speakers at least four days in
advance of the hearing
Co-sponsoring Organizations
Who: This team, consisting of the hosting organizations and the
anchor organization, included the directors of public affairs at Harvard
Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, key researchers from
these schools who have worked on organ donation, and the managing director
and communications coordinator from The Partnership.
How: This team met three times at Harvard (see Appendix E) approximately one month before the
hearing. Regular phone contact is also a necessity here.
Tasks:
- Make sure all relevant organizations are involved in planning the event
- Review purpose, goals, background, structure of hearing (see Appendix E)
- Discuss and develop policy recommendations
- Make final selection of speakers
- Invite speakers; distribute samples of written testimony to speakers
- Distribute flyer and first press release (and map of location, if
necessary); publicize in organization newsletters and to various
constituencies
- Expand invitation list and discuss who should extend those invitations
- Make follow-up calls after media advisory is released by Members
Back to top
LOGISTICS
- Venue--It is important to secure a venue that is centrally
located, large enough for the anticipated audience, and one with the
general air and dignity that is associated with a congressional event. In
our case, the Harvard Medical School, one of the hosting organizations, had
a suitable room that could accommodate 70-100 people, with room for
broadcast and print media.
- Room arrangement--Typically hearing rooms are arranged with two
tables facing each other. The Member(s) of Congress sit behind one table
facing the room; the panelists sit at the other table facing the members
with their backs to the rest of the audience. In our case, we had an area
to the side of the tables that was available for broadcast media and
photographers. A tip: we recommend designating some preferred seating for
the print media and other special guests that is away from the broadcast
media. A "Reserved" sign should be put on the seats.
- Accessibility--Make sure the building is wheelchair accessible
and that arrangements are made to accommodate special needs.
- Overflow room--We were fortunate to have a facility where people
could be accommodated with closed circuit TV if the main room filled up.
This may not always be possible.
- Security--Check with the staff(s) of the Member(s) of Congress to make
sure that any security considerations are addressed.
- Microphones for panelists as well as the congressional
representative(s)
- Refreshments--coffee and cookies, for example
- Sign-in sheets for attendees with name, affiliation, address, phone
- Photographer
- Water for speakers
- Name cards for all speakers--Prepare "tent" style cards that sit on the
table, printed with name on both sides so it is visible to the Member(s) as
well as the audience.
- Easel--for speakers using graphical displays to accompany their
testimony
- Tape recording, either audio or video
- Timer device for the speakers. In our case it was nothing fancy. We
designated one staff person to be the timekeeper. Each speaker was
allotted four minutes. After three minutes, the timekeeper held up a
yellow sign indicating one minute remaining. After four minutes, she held
up a red "stop" sign. This is to be used as a reminder; it is realistic to
expect some speakers to go slightly over time.
- Table for copies of testimony and other hand-out materials
Back to top
CONTENT
General comments:
In our view it is extremely important to have strong consensus between the
hosting organization(s) and the key congressional staff about the goals of
the event and the key issues to be addressed (see section on Concept
Statement). An event like this cannot address all issues and will lose
impact if too many issues are tackled at one time.
- Create a concept statement early (see Appendix B) and review it in detail with the
appropriate congressional staff. This will set the overall framework for
the event.
- Draft agenda: Create a rough agenda based on the concept statement
with a few key points that you want each speaker to address.
- Chose person(s) to open the event and deliver welcome statement.
- Provide assistance as needed drafting speaking points for welcome
statement (example points: history of the Congressional Task Force on Organ
Donation, local need for organ transplants, re-cap of the Member of
Congress' specific involvement with the issue, etc.).
- Brainstorm possible speakers:
- Push yourself to identify new voices, people with direct experience
who can present it well.
- Check with congressional staff for their recommendations, requests.
- Use your network to get others in the community to help you identify
good speakers.
- Be attentive to reflecting the community you are in. If minority
donation is an issue you plan to address, make sure you have speakers who
can address it with authority and first-hand knowledge.
- Prioritize your speaker invitations, and identify best person to extend
the formal invitation to speak.
- Confirm all speakers, and update draft agenda to reflect actual
participants.
- Provide background and clear guidance to invited speakers:
- Copy of current agenda with brief summary of topics to be addressed
by each speaker
- All logistical details (where, when, etc.)
- Key points you want the speaker to address in their testimony
- Examples of previous testimony
- Time limit on their remarks
- The need for written testimony as well as oral statement
- Request a one-paragraph biographical statement to be passed to the
congressional staff for use when the Member introduces the speaker at the
hearing
- Deadline for submitting written testimony (The congressional staff will
want this a few days in advance of the event.)
- Explain that the Member(s) may ask questions after the testimony is
delivered.
- The importance of highlighting policy implications or recommendations,
if this is an agreed goal with the congressional staff
- Instructions to bring multiple copies of the final testimony to the
event for distribution (We advised bringing 60-70 copies, based on the
predicted attendance.)
- Support to speakers: Speakers will differ in the support they want.
Examples of support to offer include brainstorming the content and
structure of their testimony, reviewing their written draft, assisting them
in crafting their oral statement, actual rehearsal of their spoken
testimony.
- Follow up prior to testimony due date to make sure speakers are on
track.
- Gather copies of written testimony for congressional staff.
Back to top
MEDIA
Before the hearing:
- Write first press release to announce event and distribute to trade
media and newsletters of local donation and transplant
organizations.
- Produce flyer about event and distribute to all those with an interest
in the event-local transplant centers, medical schools, transplant
organizations, OPOs, etc. (Appendix
F)
- If possible, set up mass-faxing technology for distributing media
advisory, flyers, etc.
- Designate media spokespersons at all hosting and participating
organizations.
- Work with Congressional press secretaries to draft media advisory and
coordinate publicity.
- Release media advisory on Congressional letterhead 4 or 5 days before
hearing. (Appendix G)
- Participating organizations should send media advisory to and call
their own media contacts.
- Make follow-up phone calls to media.
- Send media advisory to national trade media with a promise of providing
follow-up materials, including copies of testimony.
- Post notice of hearing on TransWeb, Web sites of participating
organizations and other related Web sites. Be sure to consider space
available and whether this might create too large an audience for the
event.
At the hearing:
- Make necessary arrangements for parking media vans at hearing,
providing electrical outlets, etc.
- Have an appropriate area in the front of the room designated and set up
for broadcast cameras, paying attention to lighting, sound and electrical
considerations.
- Have a separate area available for print reporters near the front.
- Hosting organizations should have person designated who will greet media and tend to their requests.
- Have a sign in sheet at the hearing and make sure you add media names
to your media database for future press releases.
- Assemble at least 10 complete sets of testimony for attending
media.
Following the hearing:
- Call or write notes to media who ran stories and suggest further
follow-up stories. (Appendix H)
- Send packs containing a follow-up press release and complete sets of
testimony to trade media and others who requested this. (Appendix I)
Back to top
A FEW ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS
In reflecting on our experience, here are some things that we felt worked
well and that we would want to do again:
- Build enthusiasm among all of the participants, sponsors and attendees.
Enthusiasm is infectious, and will help to make the event
successful.
- Have a clear point of view about the purpose and goals of the event.
No event can address every important issue. By selecting a focus and
sticking to it, the event will be more coherent and will leave a lasting
impression on those attending.
- Be prepared for anything. When dealing with elected officials,
schedules can change right up to the last minute. Have a back up plan
ready, as well as a plan for communicating last minute changes to everyone
involved, particularly people who are traveling some distance to attend the
event.
- Draw on people's real experiences. Encourage case studies, accounts of
real people doing real things that illustrate the overall points you are
trying to emphasize.
- Have the event in a politically neutral setting. Make sure that the
collaborative nature of the event is apparent. For us this meant having an
academic setting, and we recommend considering this when possible.
- Realize that you can't make everyone happy all the time. There will be
time constraints that make it impossible to accommodate everyone who would
like to speak. There's not much you can do about this, except to be clear
about how the speakers were selected. Also make it clear that anyone can
submit written testimony, whether or not they also deliver oral testimony.
Encourage people to do this, and provide examples of testimony to help
them.
- Use the network in your area. Keep asking who should be
involved/informed. How about the state medical and hospital associations?
How about any service clubs with an interest in the issue? What about
religious leaders? Make sure you reach out to the minority community and
that they are represented on the panels and in the audience. Think beyond
the usual participants.
- Think about "photo ops" for the media. We invited the Massachusetts
Transplant Games team, who were introduced by Rep. Moakley and presented a
team t-shirt to him.
- Mass-faxing set up through a computer modem saves a tremendous amount
of time when sending out media advisories, planning meeting agendas, etc.
Consider using this technology to get your messages out.
There were a few things we would do differently:
- Meet the needs of print media. We had a good set-up for the broadcast
media, but hadn't set aside preferential seating in front for print media,
away from the cameras. This would have been appreciated.
- Don't lose sleep over the need for a dress rehearsal. We attempted to
schedule one, which proved impossible. In actuality, it wasn't
needed.
- Get contact information for anyone who may be traveling to attend the
event--this includes the congressional staff. If there are last minute
changes, you need to inform people who will be affected, especially if
long-distance travel is involved.
Back to top
 
 
