CONGRESSIONAL FIELD HEARING ON ORGAN AND TISSUE DONATION

A How-To Guide based on:

"Organ and Tissue Donation: Mobilizing Massachusetts Families, Communities and Hospitals"
held September 30, 1996 at Harvard Medical School, Boston


Prepared by: Tana Sherman and Carol Beasley
The Partnership for Organ Donation, Boston, MA

Kathleen Teixeira
Representative J. Joseph Moakley
Massachusetts Ninth Congressional District

Lauren Ewers
Senator Edward M. Kennedy
Massachusetts


TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION


A Congressional Field Hearing can be an important tool for local organizations who are working to solve the organ donor shortage. Such an event can:

On September 30, 1996, the first-ever hearing on organ and tissue donation outside of Washington was held in Boston by Rep. Joseph Moakley and Sen. Edward Kennedy. Organized by The Partnership for Organ Donation, the event, "Organ and Tissue Donation: Mobilizing Massachusetts Families, Communities, and Hospitals," was co-sponsored by Harvard Medical School and the Harvard School of Public Health. Working on the planning committees were members of the Massachusetts donation/transplantation community. Witnesses included donor family members, transplant recipients, doctors, researchers and professionals from organ procurement organizations and other local organizations.

The event was very successful with a large audience turn-out, good media coverage, a renewed sense of collegiality and cooperation among the many organizations working to increase donation, and excellent testimony provided by two panels of speakers--one panel focusing on family perspectives and successful community outreach and the other on optimizing donation in hospitals.

This "How-To Guide" was prepared to strongly encourage other organizations concerned with organ and tissue donation to work with your congressional representatives and local legislators to organize similar events in your own region. In the pages that follow, we tell you how we did it, from the first concept statement to the final media coverage. We learned a lot and are happy to share our experiences--both what worked and what we would do differently--in the hope that it will encourage others to get involved.

We welcome feedback on this material. Please feel free to contact Tana Sherman or Carol Beasley at (617) 482-5746, or via electronic mail tsherman@organ-donation.org or cbeasley@organ-donation.org .

Back to top

TIMELINE


Most of the planning took place within a four month time-frame from June through September 1996. The general tasks are described in the month in which they occurred.

MONTH 1


MONTH 2


MONTH 3


MONTH 4


MONTH 5--After the Hearing




Back to top

PLANNING TEAMS


As soon as word got out that a Congressional field hearing was being planned , we began to receive numerous phone calls from individuals and groups who wanted to be involved. Clearly, if we had tried to convene everyone from the start and had tried to reach a consensus on every planning decision, the event would never have taken place! Therefore, we identified three distinct planning teams, each with an important role in making decisions about the hearing:

Congressional Aides & the Anchor Organization



Who: This team consisted of two Congressional health policy aides--one from Rep. Moakley's office and one from Sen. Kennedy's office; the managing director and communications coordinator from The Partnership; an aide from Sen. Kennedy's Boston office; and Rep. Moakley's press secretary. Key decisions were made by this group prior to convening either of the other two teams.

How: All decisions were arrived at through regular phone conversations, including one conference call, and were made by consensus.

Tasks:


Co-sponsoring Organizations



Who: This team, consisting of the hosting organizations and the anchor organization, included the directors of public affairs at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health, key researchers from these schools who have worked on organ donation, and the managing director and communications coordinator from The Partnership.

How: This team met three times at Harvard (see Appendix E) approximately one month before the hearing. Regular phone contact is also a necessity here.

Tasks:


Back to top

LOGISTICS




Back to top

CONTENT


General comments:

In our view it is extremely important to have strong consensus between the hosting organization(s) and the key congressional staff about the goals of the event and the key issues to be addressed (see section on Concept Statement). An event like this cannot address all issues and will lose impact if too many issues are tackled at one time.



Back to top

MEDIA


Before the hearing:


At the hearing:

Following the hearing:

Back to top

A FEW ADDITIONAL THOUGHTS


In reflecting on our experience, here are some things that we felt worked well and that we would want to do again:


There were a few things we would do differently:
Back to top



 

 

TransWeb home page go to the top of this page